![]() |
||
September 1, 2006 Accessorize Your iPod While in college, I worked at an electronics store, where I was told that accessories, or "add-ons," were the single easiest way to increase my sales commissions. Making sure to offer the customer batteries, better headphones, protective gear, or an extended warranty for that $50 Sony Walkman guaranteed me higher margins and, ultimately, more money in my pocket. Much of that money went immediately back into the coffers of electronics manufacturers. At the time, I owned Sony Studio MDR-V headphones and a very nice Sony Walkman cassette player. Fifteen years later, Sonys groundbreaking Walkman has been displaced by Apple Computers beautifully designed iPod. Aside from the obvious differences between the analog and digital formats, both products are personal music players. Whereas the Walkmans success was due to its groundbreaking portability, the iPods popularity stems from its inspired design and distinct personality. With the iPod, Apple has delivered a device that eases the customers acquisition and playback of music, either by ripping CDs or by downloading songs from Apples Music Store onto an iPod, using Apples iTunes Jukebox software. No other music player offers this level of seamless integration and access to music in a single package, plus a healthy dose of "Apple personality." The iPods sales figures have been staggering, and include income from me: I own a 2GB iPod Nano. Statistics published this year by the Consumer Electronics Association indicated that sales of MP3 players accounted for almost 40% of the $10 billion spent on audio in 2005. The CEA didnt single out individual brands, but figures published a year earlier by the NPD Group, a market-research company that uses consumer information and point-of-sale statistics to forecast market trends, alleged that the iPod made up 92% of MP3 player sales in 2004.
Ive sampled a couple of these desktop systems, and their sound quality has varied from hollow and shrill to full and involving. The Teac SR-L200i favored the latter category. I didnt think this clock-radio design would sound very good, but after a few days in my office it had convinced me otherwise. The tabletop Teacs warm, surprisingly robust sound competently covered up the artifacts of MP3 compression, while its stout, credit-card-sized remote provided enough control to make it a cool office companion. The Teac wont give you hard-hitting bass or extended highs, but it will provide smooth, enjoyable background sound. Its build quality is lightweight but very well finished; my sample came in the same pearlescent black the iPod is available in. If you own a Video iPod, the SR-LXi includes a video output for connection to a TV.
Its little details like this that make the difference between a product thats excellent and one thats merely acceptable. During my stint as a salesman it was easy to separate the good accessories from the cheap knockoffs. Good accessories were designed to integrate and operate seamlessly with a product, while lesser samples felt tacked-together and unintuitive. Designed by committee and manufactured by the lowest bidder, poorly made accessories ultimately ended up in the junk drawer or trash. Conversely, some extremely well made products held questionable value in the eyes and ears of penny-wise consumers because they couldnt assess the benefit of the additional cost. Cables are such an area. While Ive heard differences among cables, I was skeptical about whether upgrading the cable on my iPod Nano would make a difference in the sound -- especially when listening in locations where the ambient noise exceeds the noise floor of the portable audio system. According to AudioLineOuts Ken Ball, the iPod Dock cables he offers are typically paired with portable headphone amplifiers such as the Portaphile. I used my HeadRoom Total AirHead and a pair of Sennheiser HD 580 headphones during my evaluation of the Dock cables.
As with most audio tweaks, I heard the biggest payoff when I sat in the comfort of a quiet room, in the dark, my eyes closed, listening through high-quality headphones and a dedicated amp. Listening only to my iPod, the biggest difference was between compression algorithms. For noncritical listening I prefer Apples excellent AAC because, even at 192kbps, MP3s sound a bit thin to me. With a higher-resolution amp and headphones, the high-frequency softening of AAC is apparent. For critical listening, Apple Lossless differs little from a CD. Unfortunately, lossless files eat up about 10MB per song, which is a lot of space in a 2GB Nano. I no longer have my Sony headphones or Walkman, and I dont miss them. The combination of my iPod Nano and a pair of Etymotic ER6i headphones sound better, in a much more compact and manageable package. As long as manufacturers continue to offer high-quality accessories like the ones mentioned here, the Apple iPod will continue to grow in popularity, and continue to drive manufacturers to create products that will give it yet more flexibility and integration with our increasingly active lifestyles. ...Anthony Di Marco
|
||
|